inside sources print logo
Get up-to-date news in your inbox

DC’s VA Medical Center Still Hasn’t Processed 1,550 Inches of Pages in Patient Records

Following up on last year’s scathing report revealing systemic corruption within the Department of Veterans Affairs and dangerous conditions at Washington, D.C.’s VA Medical Center, the Office of the Inspector General found that D.C.’s VA Medical Center still hasn’t processed 1,550 inches of pages in patient records dating back to 2014, which could pose a serious health risk to countless veterans.

One local D.C. veteran who serves as a deputy director for Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW), Michael Figliogli, told InsideSources that the backlog is the “worst I’ve heard of in my 10 years [of working for veterans].”

The new report, filed earlier this week on the OIG’s website, summarizes the Inspector General’s findings after visiting the medical center in May 2018, just two months after releasing the initial damning report detailing dangerous conditions at the medical center.

According to the report, because the medical center did not scan the patient records into the electronic health records (EHR) system, “this caused patient results within these records to not be available to healthcare providers. As of the May 2018 OIG visit, the contractors were apparently still unable to access the EHR system to commence document scanning.”

If healthcare providers don’t receive updated medical records, the OIG said, this can prevent them from “accessing patient results to perform a comprehensive evaluation of the patients’ healthcare needs and provide timely quality care.”

Failing to process medical records for veterans with sensitive medical conditions like Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), suicidal tendencies, or a variety of debilitating physical conditions can severely impact veterans’ quality of life and can even result in loss of life.

The VA told InsideSources in an email that 800 inches “consist of redundant information, such as discharge instructions” and argued they have “no impact on patient care.” This report also includes this official response from the VA regarding the OIG’s findings.

Medical journals dispute the assertion that discharge instructions have no impact on patient care. On the contrary, one study conducted by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (a division of the National Institute of Health) asserts that discharge instructions do impact the health of the patient and whether the patient develops complications and returns for additional care.

According to the VA, the enormous backlog is due to contractors struggling to access the EHR system.

“The facility awarded contracts to seven companies to scan backlogged documents into the EHR in January 2018; however, the administrative processing of contracted staff caused further delays,” the OIG reported. “Only after the Facility contacted the National Contracting Office for their assistance did the VISN Contracting Officer approve and submit the contract for processing by the Veteran Service Center on April 11, 2018. As of the May 2018 OIG visit, the contractors were apparently still unable to access the EHR system to commence scanning the documents.”

The medical center claims it “is utilizing additional resources within the Medical Center to reduce the backlog.”

Despite all the OIG recommendations from the initial report for the medical center to improve its conditions and safety features, the OIG found more examples of negligence and incompetence.

In one case, the OIG found that a “patient’s provider did not order anticoagulant medication after a coronary artery bypass graft surgery. One week later, the patient was re-admitted to the Facility with a diagnosis of pulmonary embolism — a life-threatening condition that could have been related to the lack of the appropriate anticoagulation medication.”

Throughout the report, the OIG repeatedly calls for more oversight, training and continuity in leadership to address the center’s issues. For the past several years, the center has had no permanent, full-time director.

Figlioli told InsideSources that “everyone was alarmed” by last year’s report, and said while he has not had a “super negative experience” with the D.C. center, he thinks the center needs more training and oversight.

“I think this is a byproduct of a lack of full time employees across nationwide healthcare, especially the VA, there’s thousands of vacancies,” he said. “If you have less people take on more tasks, focus gets lost.”

Dawn Jirak, another deputy director for who served as a U.S. Air Force medic for 20 years, told InsideSources that she thinks the center needs consistent leadership and accountability. She also said she visited the D.C. center once, but did not return because it wasn’t friendly and seemed “overly crowded and less medically organized.”

“Having worked in a hospital, I know every time you come on shift, you do the rounds and check the expiration dates on medication, so that should be done daily on every shift,” she said. But according to the OIG report’s findings, employees were not doing that. “A lot of the problem is the lack of continuity with the leadership. People are changed out every quarter. You don’t have the vested interest. You may want to make things better, but you’re only there for a couple months and you know people can’t get stuff done.”

For years, the VA has struggled to fill job vacancies, especially in medical centers. Part of the problem, Jirak said, is the jobs require security clearance and extensive background checks, which deter people from applying. As the report notes, the contractors hired to process the 1,550 inches of patient records struggled to get clearance, which further delayed the backlog.

That said, Jirak thinks the 1,550 inches of backlogged records is fairly common for the VA.

“I cannot say exactly how many inches of paperwork are floating around at the facilities, but I can say that the conversion from hard records to electronic records takes a long time, and it is an issue,” she said. “When I was on active duty, all the papers had to be filed (physically). And we had several feet of unfixed paperwork. All the medtechs had to come in on the weekend to file the paperwork, because it’s a big deal when the doctors don’t have the right paperwork. There is no continuity in [patient] care.”

Again, the root of the problem lies in consistent oversight, accountability, and the overwhelming number of job vacancies across the VA.

“A lot of it has to do with not micromanaging, but holding people accountable for what they’re supposed to be doing,” she said. “I think best practices from other medical centers need to be shared.”

This story was updated to include the VA’s response on February 1, 2019 at 9:00 a.m.

Follow Kate on Twitter

Shulkin’s Out: What Does That Mean for Manchester VA?

For former Veterans Affairs Secretary David Shulkin, the Manchester, NH VA Medical Center was both his high point and his downfall. Now New Hampshire officials are wondering what his legacy will be for Granite State veterans.

Within hours of President Trump’s tweet announcing that he was firing Shulkin and replacing him with White House physician Navy Rear Admiral Ronny Jackson, NH Rep. Carol Shea-Porter tweeted:

Among those commitments: $30 million in new spending on the Manchester VA Medical Center–a high-profile pledge he made in Manchester, surrounded by state leaders, just weeks after firing the top two local VA officials.  Gov. Chris Sununu and other political leaders said they were pleased with the reform efforts of Secretary Shulkin. “It’s a new day, ” Shea-Porter said at the time. Manchester appeared to be a big win for Shulkin.

Unfortunately it also played a cameo role in his ouster. The VA secretary was unable to shake the consequences of expensive (and questionable) taxpayer funded travel.  According to a damning Inspector General’s report, when confronted about apparently light, tourism-friendly schedule on an official trip to Copenhagen, Shulkin defended himself by pointing to the time he spent “handling of matters relating to a media crisis that developed relating to allegations of substandard care at the Manchester VA Medical Center.”

It appears Shulkin mishandled the entire “luxury travel” scandal. As USA Today reports:

He first blasted the VA inspector general’s findings that he improperly accepted Wimbledon tickets and airfare for his wife during the 10-day junket. He then refused to accept the determination that his chief of staff misled ethics officials to get clearance for his wife’s airfare, suggesting instead that her email had been hacked. Shulkin later expressed regret and repaid the cost of the tickets and airfare. But he also complained that the appointees were targeting and undermining him.

That’s not what President Trump wanted to hear. But it could be music to the ears of VA reformers urging that veteran’s health services be handled by the private sector, the so-called “privatization” issue. A source close to VA leadership told NHJournal:

“Shulkin enjoyed tremendous support from the Veterans Service Organizations because they knew he wouldn’t privatize. Veterans are proud of their service and the benefits they’ve earned.  VA Healthcare is one of those benefits.”

Privatization is also clearly on the minds of New Hampshire’s politicians. Rep. Annie Kuster posted on her FB page:

I was disappointed by the misuse of taxpayer dollars by Secretary Shulkin that eroded the trust of the American people. Unfortunately, I have serious concerns that his firing today will strengthen efforts to privatize operations within the Department of Veterans Affairs. I’ve spoken with many Granite State veterans who fear the loss of camaraderie and the full recognition of their veteran status that comes with receiving care at the VA.

Privatization of the VA health system has long been the goal of economic conservatives, but they’ve always lacked the political support to get it done. It seems highly unlikely that the new VA Secretary, a White House doctor with a military background, is going to lead that ideological charge.

 

VA Fails to Track Officials That Do Union Work Instead of Their Jobs

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has failed to properly track taxpayer funded hours spent working on union tasks, according to testimony Thursday.

Official time is a policy that allows federal officials to do union work instead of their actual jobs. The VA scandal was partially blamed on the practice, when it broke in 2014. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) testified before a congressional hearing that the agency isn’t even properly tracking official time hours.

“We assessed the reliability of the data by reviewing relevant agency documentation about the data and the systems that produced them and interviewing knowledgeable agency officials, among other steps,” GAO workforce director Cindy Brown Barnes testified. “Based on our assessment, we found the data were not sufficiently reliable to determine the amount of official time used by VA employees and the purposes for which it was used.”

The GAO testimony summarized a more detailed report from Jan. 24. The GAO found the issue primarily stems from how official time hours are being recorded and then calculated. The American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) argues official time allows federal unions to properly fulfill their legally mandated duties.

“These legal provisions have produced an efficient and effective mechanism for the fulfillment of the duty of fair representation,” AFGE President J. David Cox testified during the hearing. “Federal employees agree to serve as volunteer employee representatives, and agencies allow them to use a reasonable amount of official time to engage in representational activities while on duty status.”

The Capital Research Center (CRC) blamed official time for contributing to an agency scandal that left numerous veterans dead. The VA scandal first broke in 2014 when it was revealed the agency was subjecting veterans to incredibly long wait times and questionable treatment practices.

“While veterans of the U.S. armed forces wait for health care, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is paying hundreds of its employees to work full-time for labor unions,” CRC said in a report from 2014.

Republicans responded to the scandal by introducing legislation that would make it easier to dismiss agency officials. The VA Accountability Act of 2015 would allow the veterans affairs secretary to more easily remove or demote employees based on performance or misconduct. Unions decried the bill as an attack on worker rights.

Federal statute allows government employees to use official time to perform certain union representational activities. The activities include negotiating and processing grievances. The practice is also used by some state agencies, where it is known as release time.

The practice is commonly used by federal agencies. The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) found in a 2014 report that official time use increased from approximately 2.9 million hours to over 3.4 million from 2008 to 2012.

The GAO made several recommendations to address the issue in its earlier report. It notes the department should increase efforts to provide consistent guidance, standardize the methods used by facilities for determining the amount of official time used, and take steps to update its tracking systems.

The VA did not respond to a request for comment by InsideSources.

Follow Connor on Twitter

Subscribe for the Latest From InsideSources Every Morning