inside sources print logo
Get up-to-date news in your inbox

What Really Happened at the Richmond Gun Rights Rally?

Cam Edwards wants you to know that nearly everything you heard about Monday’s gun-rights rally in Richmond, VA, was wrong. Including the claim that it was a “gun-rights rally.” He should know. Edwards is the editor of BearingArms.com, a former NRA TV host, and he was on stage at the event.

“It wasn’t ‘gun-rights’ day, it was ‘Lobby Day,’ he told InsideSources. “Lobby Day, which is usually held on Martin Luther King Day because it’s a holiday and allows for more folks to get to the Capitol, is a day for citizens to lobby their lawmakers on all kinds of issues, not just gun rights. In the past, we’ve had pro-life groups, tax groups, people with views on economic issues.

“It’s just that this year, the Second Amendment issue sucked all the oxygen out of the room,” Edwards said.

 

It also brought a massive amount of media attention, some of it suggesting the gathering would be dominated by white supremacists and potentially violent militias. One NBC reporter declared the event a “white nationalist rally in Virginia,” while representatives of the national gun control organization “March for Our Lives” claimed they had to be “snuck into the state Capitol” because “there are white supremacists and armed militias surrounding the building.”

In advance of the event, Gov. Ralph Northam — a controversial figure best known for admitting he’d worn blackface multiple times in the past– imposed an emergency order banning all weapons near the state capitol.

In the end, the rally took place without incident, was over in two hours, and Richmond police reported just one arrest. Rally attendees even cleaned up the streets afterward.

So what actually happened?

“What I saw was really, truly extraordinary,” Edwards said.

“From my vantage point on the podium, I could see tens of thousands of people, a real cross-section of Virginia:  White, black, young, old, people who brought their families — these are good people. They’re engaged citizens, and they’re working within the political system, but still they’re demonized and vilified when all they want is to be left alone.”

Edwards noted one sign in Monday’s crowd that he thought captured the mood of most gun owners: “I’d rather be at home with my family, just eatin’ beans.”

“These are just regular Americans. They don’t want to come to a political rally. But they showed up because they believe their rights are being threatened.”

 

 

Unfortunately, Second Amendment advocates say, they can’t stay home because of what National Public Radio describes as “the most dramatic change in state gun laws in recent memory.” Among the changes: Requiring people who own some rifles that Northam considers “assault firearms” to either give them up or register them with the Virginia State Police; and a ban on all magazines that can accept more than 10 rounds. There are also “red flag” laws that would allow gun confiscation by court order, and limits on the number of gun purchases a citizen could lawfully make.

Not surprisingly, these “dramatic changes” have caught the attention of gun rights supporters, an estimated 22,000 of whom showed up for Monday’s event.

Plus, Edwards notes, tens of thousands of gun-rights supporters have shown up at county supervisor and city council meetings across the state pushing to make their communities “Second Amendment Sanctuaries” in response to the proposed state laws. And 91 of the state’s 95 counties have passed resolutions opposing the new gun control proposals.

“For a previous Lobby Day, we might have had 800 to 1,000 gun owners –that would have been a good turnout,” Edwards said. “I think part of that is because we had Republican control of the legislature, so people felt like ‘OK, at least my gun rights are safe.’ But with the Democrats’ takeover and the types of legislation they’re introducing — bills that would turn many gun owners into felons simply for keeping the stuff you have–the result was this incredible response.

“And I don’t think it’s going to be going away, either.”

Not surprisingly, presidential politics were also on display in Richmond as well. Many attendees wore #MAGA hats or carried signs supporting President Trump. And just days before the event, Trump tweeted:

Across the aisle, all the Democratic 2020 frontrunners have proposed some form of gun confiscation, federal registration or federal licensing. “Unfortunately, this time around there’s no pro-gun-rights Democrat running for president, like a [former U.S. Senator] Jim Webb,” Edwards says. “Some of my libertarian friends try to tell me ‘Andrew Yang is pretty good,’ but then they have to add ‘except for on guns,’ and that’s kind of a sticking point for a lot of us.

“Which is why it’s going to be a pretty stark choice for gun owners this year between Donald Trump and whoever the Democrats nominate,” Edwards said.

 

NH Democrats Unified in Vote to Ban Guns from House Chamber

On their first day in session, New Hampshire House Democrats voted in lockstep to ban members from bringing “deadly weapons”–aka “firearms”– into the House chamber, overturning a pro-gun policy passed by a GOP majority four years ago. While pro-2A protesters filled the gallery and Republicans like Rep. Al Baldasaro (R-Londonderry) gave fiery speeches from the floor, Democrats said little, often declining to even answer questions.  Instead, they let their votes do the talking.

Democrats voted 220 to 163 for the gun ban, with the support of virtually every Democrat in attendance. (The House has a 233/167 split.)   An earlier motion to table the rule change failed by a nearly-identical margin, 221-164, with just three Democrats (Jeff Goley, Mark King and Peter Leishman) voting with the GOP to set the measure aside.

“This body has committed a grievous error that violates the constitutional rights of members of this historic body,” House Minority Leader Dick Hinch (R-Merrimack) said from the floor.

“This is simply a matter of public safety,” House Majority Leader Doug Ley (D-Jaffrey) said in a statement after the vote. “Allowing lawmakers and members of the public to bring their guns to the State House clearing increases the potential for an avertable tragic event. The amendment passed today restores common sense to our practices in the legislature.”

Perhaps more telling was this tweet from NH Democratic Party chair Ray Buckley several hours before the vote was even taken:

The outcome of the vote was hardly a surprise, but Buckley’s confidence is worth noting.  Holding virtually the entire caucus on an issue like gun rights–which are relatively popular in some of the traditionally-GOP seats Democrats picked up in November’s blue wave–is a sign of party unity that should concern the NHGOP.   Particularly given their own failure to unify behind several of Gov. Chris Sununu’s key issues when they had the majority last year, like fighting internet sales taxes and vetoing subsidies to biomass.

“But remember, Republicans were united today, too,” Stephen Stepanek told NHJournal after the vote. “We stuck together as a block, something we’ve got to continue to do in 2019.”  Stepanek, who is the front-runner to become the next chairman of the NHGOP, acknowledges that Republicans didn’t come through for Gov. Sununu and their own party last year.

“But I believe Republican legislators will stick together this session,” Stepanek said. “They have to. We need to stay together so voters can see the differences between Republicans and Democrats, so they can see that Democrats are chipping away at our basic rights, like the right to keep and bear arms.” Stepanek, a former House member himselfe, said that if elected chairman, he would use his position to promote party unity among the notoriously unruly members of the House GOP.

“If Republicans stick together, the Democrats will give us issues to run on –and win back the legislature with–in 2020,” Stepanek said. “Democrats are going to do stupid things.  They can’t help themselves.”

But is keeping legislators from carrying guns on the House floor really one of those “stupid things?” Do New Hampshire voters, who tell pollsters they support gun control measures like banning so-called “assault weapons” and limiting the size of gun magazines, really care about the right to legislate while armed?

“Anyone who says ‘I’m pro-Second-Amendment, but…’ isn’t really pro-2A,” a protester named Scott told NHJournal outside the House chamber. He declined to give his last name, was wearing a handgun on his belt a waved a sign reading “Ban Idiots, Not Guns.”

According to Joe Sweeney, spokesperson for the NHGOP, the party highlighted Wednesday’s vote to alert gun-rights advocates about the Democrats’ larger anti-gun agenda for the coming session.

“It’s a slippery slope,” he told NHJournal. “If you have members who will vote to take away rights from their fellow members of the House, who else will they vote to take away rights from? Today is mobilizing our people to be ready to fight in a month or so when more anti-gun bills come out.”

“This is the first day of a long two years,” Sweeney said.

NH Dems Say Lack of Gun Ban at State House Is Scaring Away School Children

As promised, newly-elected Speaker of the House Steve Shurtleff began the process of banning guns from the House chamber Wednesday morning with a 6-4 vote by the Rules Committee to amend house rules to prohibit the carrying of firearms in Representatives’ Hall.  And, as is often the case, Democrats say they’re doing it “for the children.”

While he acknowledged the existing policy of allowing armed citizens and legislators into the House chamber has never created a problem, Shurtleff says he’s concerned about school kids.   “In addition to being the place we make laws, it’s also a classroom. We have fourth graders coming in to view us in session and I think like any classroom we don’t want firearms present,” Shurtleff said.

Democratic State Rep. Lucy Weber took the argument a step farther during the Rules Committee debate. “There has been a chilling effect on willingness of schools to send their kids here,” Rep. Weber claimed.

Rep. Dick Hinch (R-Merrimack), leader of the GOP House minority, pushed back against that claim, saying it is “unfair and inaccurate to say that fourth graders have been in any way impacted by this. I have not seen any school grade that has felt inhibited about coming for a school tour,” the Union-Leader reports.

Hinch also objected to the ban in general, saying in a statement that “by removing this basic right, we are effectively making the chamber a gun-free zone and less safe environment for our colleagues.”

Since a GOP-controlled House first revoked the ban in 2011, House rules on the matter have changed along with changes in party control of the legislature.   In addition to turning the House chamber into a gun-free zone, Shurtleff told NHPR that, if the gun ban went into effect, he would ask the Department of Safety to increase the State Police presence at House Chamber.

The response to the committee vote from Republicans and Second Amendment supporters was immediate.  “The ink is barely dry on their oaths of office and they’re already trampling the constitution,” former state representative JR Hoell of the New Hampshire Firearms Coalition told NHJournal.

“This is the Democrats’ first shot fired in their battle against the Second Amendment. The most important aspect of this vote is that they are telling us they don’t trust their fellow legislators to have firearms. If that’s how they feel about their fellow politicians, how do you think they feel about the rest of us,” Hoell asked. “Their next step is to ban [the rights of] citizens.”

And a tweet from the NHGOP noted the irony of Speaker Shurteff taking away guns from law-abiding citizens then asking for more police protection: “Think about this logically. The @NHDems want extra protection when they ban guns around them, conceding they keep people safe. Is Speaker Shurtleff going to ask for extra protection when he walks around town, too?”

Former Speaker Bill O’Brien, who led the GOP’s first successful effort to repeal the ban, told NHJournal that suggestions about children being too scared to come to the state house were laughable.  “The number of children visiting the State House hasn’t changed at all over the years, with or without the ban.  What we have here is an exercise in virtue signaling,” O’Brien said.

O’Brien agrees with his fellow Republicans who are concerned about anti-Second Amendment activism from the new Democratic majority in Concord. “Democratic legislators will be playing to their base, not serving the people of New Hampshire,” he told NHJournal.  “They’ve got to show [anti-gun billionaires] Michael Bloomberg and Tom Steyer that all the money they sent up here wasn’t wasted.”

“My friends in the pro-2A [Second Amendment] community are telling me that, from their perspective, nothing the Democrats might try next would surprise them.”