New Hampshire began 2018 with a brutal winter-weather bang. The New Year’s Eve high in Manchester was just 5 degrees. The low? -2. It was part of a two-week cold snap that drove residents indoors—and energy bills through the roof. And it wasn’t just energy ratepayers who paid the price. The environment took a hit, too.

“During the two weeks of Arctic cold, New England generators burned through about 2 million barrels of oil,” noted ISO New England CEO Gordon van Welie in an after-action report. “That’s about 84 million gallons, more than twice as much as all the oil used by New England power plants during the entire year of 2016.”

High heating bills and increased greenhouse gas emissions from oil and coal are not the outcomes Granite Staters want. Not politicians, environmental groups or ratepayers.  But that’s exactly what they got last winter. The question now is: Will it happen again?

“When natural gas supplies are tighter due to insufficient pipeline capacity to meet demand when it’s cold, the grid has to rely on less efficient oil-fired generation,” Marc Brown, president of the New England Ratepayers Association told NHJournal. “The grid itself will probably be OK. But that being said, if we get a serious cold snap and have a few contingencies on the grid, it wouldn’t shock me of we got a rolling blackout or two.  That’s how stressed our energy infrastructure is right now.”

So will the winter of 2018-19 be as bad as last year?  The cold weather appears ready for a return engagement:

“I think a longer than normal, colder than normal, and stormier than normal winter is on the way,” Joe Bastardi of told NHJournal. “In particular in southern New England.  I’m not sure it will get as cold for a week as it did last year, but overall, November through March will be colder than last year as a whole.”

More cold weather means more energy consumption, and spending more money. From the U.S. Energy Information Administration:

“Most U.S. households can expect higher heating expenditures this winter (October through March) compared with last winter. Higher expected winter heating expenditures are mainly the result of higher prices for heating fuels, as temperatures are expected to be similar to last winter in much of the country.”

The New England region will be the hardest hit—right in the wallet– due to the region’s disproportionate reliance on home heating oil. The EIA anticipates that propane prices will remain flat, electricity costs will rise 3 percent and natural gas will go up 5 percent. But the price of heating oil is forecast to jump by 20 percent—a huge spike in costs for a heating source that is already far higher than any other.

“Heating oil is just very expensive,” Dan Kish of the Institute for Energy Research told NHJournal. “And as the mandate for new, low-sulfur diesel expands to maritime shipping and other industries, New England homeowners will face more and more competition for their heating oil, which will put even more upward pressure on prices.”

In other words, look for heating oil prices to continue to climb, even as the cost of other fuels flattens or falls.

Kish notes that New England is uniquely reliant on heating oil—“about 40 percent of your homes in New Hampshire use heating oil, for example”—and he’s right.  According to the EIA, about 20 percent of New England households rely on heating oil, which is 80 percent of the U.S. total.

Why is New Hampshire so dependent on heating oil? Part of it is an accident of history, but more recently it’s the result of activists opposing the expansion of energy infrastructure into the region.

“Heating oil is very expensive,” says Kish.  “Natural gas, on the other hand, is so inexpensive that the price of oil would have to drop to $18 a barrel to match the price and energy output of natural gas.”

“Meanwhile, you’ve got activists trying to block any new pipelines in New England, you’re stopping electricity from Canadian hydro power from coming down through New Hampshire—this problem is almost entirely self-inflicted,” Kish says.

Sheetal Nasta, an analyst with RBN Energy tells NHJournal: “From a natural gas perspective, the biggest potential issue this winter is that storage levels are the lowest they’ve been in more than a decade, particularly in the East Region (which includes New England).”

“That means that for the gas market, they’ll be relying somewhat less on storage gas and more on daily production to meet demand. Northeast production is running higher than the winter 2017-18 average, but lower storage levels may mean reduced flexibility on a day-to-day basis, which could create localized constraints and volatility in some areas of New England on especially cold days.”

The ISO’s von Welie made a similar point talking about last winter’s cold snap: “Constrained pipeline capacity resulted in substantially higher natural gas and wholesale electricity prices, leading to less expensive oil and coal power plants operating instead of the usually competitive natural-gas-fired generation. With oil-fired generation running hard, oil supplies at plants around the region began to rapidly deplete over the two-week period, making system operations extremely challenging and significantly increasing the reliability risk to the system.”

Welie adds this ominous warning:  “In the coming years as more oil, coal, and nuclear leave the system, keeping the lights on in New England will become an even more tenuous proposition.”