inside sources print logo
Get up-to-date news in your inbox

Progressives Splinter From Dems Over New Economic Agenda

nurses union

A band of progressive groups delivered thousands of signatures to Democratic leaders Tuesday urging them to change their recently unveiled economic platform.

Democratic leaders are looking to refocus their attention back on the working class. A Better Deal was unveiled by leadership as a new economic agenda focused primarily on wages, jobs, and training. Some influential progressives are urging party leaders to go further.

The People’s Platform was unveiled as a more progressive alternative to the agenda by party leaders. The alternative platform includes additional items like free Medicare for all and free college tuition. Supporters held a rally outside the U.S. Capitol Building before delivering 100,000 petitions.

“If Democrats want to win in 2018 and beyond, we need to start by supporting legislation that addresses the real issues facing everyday Americans,” the petition stated. “Sign our petition to show your support for a legislative agenda that puts people first.”

The rally ended with supporters delivering the petitions directly to the Democratic National Committee. The national party headquarters is located close to where the rally was held. Nina Turner, a state senator from Ohio, joined the rally in support of the alternative platform.

“Last summer we succeeded in getting the Democratic Party to adopt one of the most progressive platforms in history,” Turner said in a statement provided to InsideSources. “Now we are demanding their actions back up their words. Our People’s Platform is a platform for all people. All means all. From ensuring universal access to health care to raising minimum wage and protecting our environment, it’s time to take a bold and courageous stand to do what’s right for all Americans.”

Our Revolution, Democratic Socialists of America, Democracy for America, Working Families Party, People for Bernie, Good Jobs Nation, and the Fight for $15 are among the groups that signed on. The National Nurses United also joined in despite most other major unions moving to back the agenda by party leaders.

The People’s Platform urges party leaders to support eight bills that are currently pending. The bills would expand Medicare to everyone, make college tuition free, make voting registration automatic, tax investment firms more, implement new environmental protections, and increase the federal minimum wage to $15 an hour.

Democrats renewing their focus on the working class comes less than a year after losing the presidential election. President Donald Trump was able to win rural districts that have traditionally gone blue. His populist economic message resonated with workers who felt like they had been forgotten.

Workers have experienced flat wage growth and decreased opportunities in recent years. Workers are also increasingly seeing their skills becoming obsolete in the face of emerging technologies. Trump has looked towards trade and immigration as pathways to address the problem.

Follow Connor on Twitter

Subscribe for the Latest From InsideSources Every Morning

Union Leaders Praise Dems for New Economic Agenda

Right-to-Work Laws; Organized Labor

Leadership of some of the most influential unions praised Democratic leaders Monday for unveiling a new worker-focused economic agenda.

President Donald Trump has made working class issues a focus since launching his campaign. He was able to win rural districts that have traditionally had strong liberal and union influences. His populist economic message resonated with the working class who felt like they had been forgotten.

Democrats are now refocusing their agenda back towards those workers and their families. The new approach will primarily look to improve what jobs are available, increase wages, and ensure workers have the skills they need going into the future. Union leaders were quick to applaud the new approach.

“I applaud Democrats’ commitment to building an economy that rewards working people and not just the wealthy and well-connected,” AFSCME President Lee Saunders said in a statement. “Substantial investment in infrastructure, paid family leave and a higher minimum wage are all important policy goals.”

Workers have experienced flat wage growth and decreased opportunities over recent years. Workers are also increasingly seeing their skills becoming obsolete in the face of emerging technologies. The president argued when launching his campaign that the government has failed both workers and employers.

Trump had a particular interest in protecting domestic workers from unfair foreign competition. He has looked towards trade and immigration as pathways to address the problem. Democrats echoed that concern in their new agenda by promising to aggressively crackdown on unfair foreign trade and outsourcing.

‏”The Senate Dems come out with solid economic program for Americans,” Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, said on social media.

Democrats will continue to pursue several progressive policies that make their new agenda distinct from what Republicans are doing. The new agenda reaffirms support for raising the national minimum wage to $15 an hour. It will also aim to protect entitlements like Medicare.

“The best way to accomplish these goals is to promote the freedom of Americans to join a union and negotiate a fair return on our work,” Saunders said. “Unions provide the power in numbers that make better jobs, better wages and a better future possible. We encourage all lawmakers to make freedom to join a union a centerpiece of any economic agenda going forward.”

Sen. Bernie Sanders and other leading progressive lawmakers introduced a bill May 25 aimed at increasing the federal minimum wage to $15 an hour. Sanders originally introduced the proposal in July 2015. The policy eventually gained enough support during the election to be included in the Democratic Party platform.

The National Nurses United (NNU) expressed some dissatisfaction with the new agenda. The union hopes the party will go further and include additional items like free Medicare for all and free college tuition. NNU Executive Director RoseAnn DeMoro noted online that the union will deliver 100,000 petitions to Democratic leaders Tuesday.

The Service Employees International Union (SEIU) said online that Senate Democrats understand what working families need. The union further expressed its support by linking to an opinion piece from House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi pushing the new agenda.

Follow Connor on Twitter

Subscribe for the Latest From InsideSources Every Morning

Research Shows Clinton Loss Is More Complex Than a Simple Urban-Rural Divide

urban rural continuum

Although Democrat Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by nearly 3 million, she still lost the 2016 presidential election to Republican Donald Trump. A closer look into the votes cast reveals that one of the factors of Clinton’s loss could be attributed to her underperformance in rural areas. New research suggests that while she nearly matched Barack Obama’s 2012 performance in most urban areas, she failed to match the Democratic presidential nominees in the last five elections in the less populated areas of the country.

The research was released this week by the Carsey School of Public Policy at the University of New Hampshire and was conducted by Dante Scala — associate professor of political science and a faculty fellow at the Carsey School — and Kenneth Johnson, senior demographer at the Carsey School and professor of sociology.

The researchers examined voting along a rural to urban continuum, rather than treating rural and urban as a polarity. They found significant variations in voting behavior among both urban and rural places that persist over the last five presidential elections.

“Yet, defining 2016 as the tale of two Americas — one urban, one rural — hinders a nuanced understanding of the country’s political geography,” the researchers stated. “Many political commentators mistakenly caricature rural America as a single entity, but our research … shows that complex variations in voting patterns persist among both urban and rural places.”

Several headlines after the election pushed the urban-rural divide that existed in the election. “How the Election Revealed the Divide Between City and Country,” read a piece by The Atlantic. The researches suggest that while the overall premise is true, it’s a lot more complicated than that because political pundits don’t often include suburban voters or towns adjacent to suburbs.

Clinton received 2.1 million fewer votes in rural America than Obama did four years earlier even though 531,000 more votes were cast there in 2016. Large urban counties are the base of the Democratic Party as well as their suburbs and the cores of smaller metropolitan areas. The outer edges of smaller urban areas and the vast rural regions tend to be Republican territory.

“Through the last five presidential elections voting patterns were consistent along a rural-urban continuum,” the researchers said. “Democrats did best at the urban end of the continuum and Republicans at the rural end. What is distinctly different in 2016 is that Hillary Clinton did far worse across the entire rural end of the continuum than any Democratic candidate in the previous four presidential elections.”

Image Credit: University of New Hampshire Carsey School of Public Policy

At one end of the continuum are the urban core counties of large metropolitan areas. This is where Democrats have received their greatest support in the last five presidential elections. Al Gore and John Kerry averaged slightly less than 60 percent of the vote in these areas in 2000 and 2004. Barack Obama boosted the Democrats’ urban vote share in 2008 and 2012, and Clinton maintained it in 2016. Also, the suburbs of these large metropolitan areas gave both Obama in 2012 and Clinton slightly less than a majority (49.6 and 47.8 percent, respectively).

Next on the continuum, the suburbs of smaller urban areas are more strongly Republican. It is at this point on the rural–urban continuum that the contrast between earlier elections and 2016 is evident. Here the gap between Democratic support in 2012 and 2016 widened, which ultimately led to Clinton’s loss.

At the rural end of the continuum, counties tend to be more Republican, but there is variation within these rural areas. Democrats consistently did worse in counties remote from urban areas, and in those without large towns of 10,000 to 50,000 people. This pattern continued in 2016, but there was a substantial decline in support for Clinton across all types of rural counties. For example, in 2012, Obama received 41.6 percent of the vote in rural counties adjacent to metropolitan areas that contained a large town and 38.9 percent in those that did not. Clinton received just 33.1 percent in these adjacent large town counties and 29.7 percent in other adjacent counties.

“Certainly, these rural vote totals are dwarfed by those in urban areas. But, from the suburban periphery of smaller urban areas to the most far-flung rural areas, Clinton’s inability to match the performance of any Democratic candidate since at least 2000 contributed to her defeat in crucial swing states such as Florida, Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin,” the researchers said. “Though many commentators argued that the faster population growth and growing diversity on the urban side of the rural-urban continuum would give Democrats a significant advantage in 2016, the election demonstrated that what happens at the rural end of the continuum remains important.”

Follow Kyle on Twitter.

Sign up for NH Journal’s must-read morning political newsletter.

Business Community Praises Trump’s Latest Labor Board Pick

President Donald Trump’s pick to fill the last labor board vacancy Tuesday could finally shift the political focus of an agency that businesses have condemned as becoming overly activist.

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) is tasked with overseeing labor and union dispute cases. Business leaders have expressed concern over how political the board had become during the last administration. Employment lawyer William Emanuel could soon change that by giving the Republicans majority control.

The NLRB is a five-member board that is supposed to act as an impartial judicial body. The president, however, is able to influence the board politically by who is nominated to fill the majority of seats. The business community voiced optimism with the new appointment.

“The National Restaurant Association applauds the selection of William Emanuel as a nominee to the National Labor Relations Board,” Cicely Simpson, the executive vice president of the National Restaurant Association, said in a statement provided to InsideSources. “Given the Board’s broad overreach during the previous administration and harmful decisions on joint employer, ambush elections, and micro-unions, we welcome the balance and fairness that Mr. Emanuel will bring to the Board.”

The NLRB drew particular opposition for changes it made to the joint-employer standard. The standard determines whether an employer is responsible for the employees and labor liabilities of a company it contracts with. The International Franchise Association (IFA) has been at the forefront of opposing the changes.

“Franchise owners around the country are facing a great deal of regulatory uncertainty as a result of the wreckage created by the previous administration,” IFA President Robert Cresanti said in a statement provided to InsideSources. “We urge the Senate to confirm both [Marvin] Kaplan and Emanuel quickly so the new labor board can address regulatory issues facing the franchise model as quickly as possible.”

Emanuel currently works as an employment lawyer in Los Angeles for the law firm Littler Mendelson. He has worked on cases involving union contract negotiations, strikes, and collective bargaining administration. He has particular expertise on laws that determine union access to employer’s private property.

“Mr. Emanuel is a highly qualified and well-respected labor attorney who will bring decades of relevant expertise to the board,” David French, the senior vice president for government relations at the National Retail Federation, said. “Retailers are confident that he will be a fair arbiter of the law and urge the Senate to confirm him promptly.”

Former President Barack Obama saw much of his workforce agenda implemented through board decisions. The NLRB established new precedent for contracting and union elections, and it created micro-unions. Trump has the chance to reverse the trend if his nominations get approved.

“Over the past eight years, the retail industry and employers across the country have faced a crushing regulatory burden that has created immense uncertainty in labor relations and made it much harder to grow,” French said. “Much of this uncertainty has stemmed from the NLRB’s pursuit of an activist agenda that consistently put the interests of labor unions before the rights of employers and employees. Both job creators and employees will benefit from a more balanced approach in labor relations.”

Philip Miscimarra was named to serve as the chairman of the board April 24. Miscimarra was already a member and serving as the acting chairman. Marvin Kaplan was nominated June 19 to fill the other empty seat. The Senate will first have to approve both nominations for Kaplan and Emanuel before the administration gains majority control.

Trump has also managed to fill other positions that could prove critical to his workforce focused agenda. Alexander Acosta was confirmed as the current secretary of labor April 27. Trump also announced his intent to nominate Patrick Pizzella to serve as the deputy secretary of labor.

Follow Connor on Twitter

Subscribe for the Latest From InsideSources Every Morning

U.S. Trade Ambassador Highlights Ambitious Agenda

U.S. Trade Ambassador Robert Lighthizer expressed the need for an ambitious agenda Thursday to promote domestic businesses and fight abuses from other countries.

President Donald Trump built his presidency on the promise that he would help domestic workers. He has argued the current approach to trade and immigration has allowed companies to undercut workers with cheap foreign labor. He pledged to withdraw from or renegotiate trade agreements so they better serve American workers.

Lighthizer assumed office as United States Trade Representative (USTR) last month. The agency is tasked with conducting trade negotiations and making recommendations to the president. Lighthizer highlighted what his agency is doing to reform the international trade system during a hearing with the House Ways and Means Committee.

“Let me be very clear on this point, we at the USTR want to help every American business that makes a product or provides a service increase exports to the world,” Lighthizer said. “Sometimes this requires enforcement action, other times negotiations are sufficient.”

Lighthizer detailed several key policy goals the administration is pursuing. The USTR plans to renegotiate trade deals to be fairer and more efficient, enforce trade deals more aggressively, and increase domestic exports. Lighthizer notes he has already met with his counterparts in most other major economies around the globe.

“In many cases they have expressed a willingness to work with the United States on efforts to reform the global trading system in ways the will lead to market outcomes that are both fairer and more efficient,” Lighthizer said. “We have also reached out to members of this committee, other administration officials, and key stakeholders in an effort to determine what improvements are needed in the international trading system.”

The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) has become a major focus for the administration. The president has denounced the deal for being unfair to domestic businesses. Lighthizer notes the administration has already begun the process of renegotiating it with partners like Canada and Mexico.

The USTR is also requesting an additional $57.6 million to implement the trade agenda. A six percent budget increase from 2016. Funds will help USTR implement a new inter-agency center on trade policy and hire eight additional staff to help with trade enforcement.

Lighthizer notes the agency will be working to more aggressively pursue countries that violate trade agreements with the United States. He also says the agency will more actively defend the country against baseless litigation from the World Trade Organization.

Trump has already delivered on one major campaign promise by upending the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). The agreement would have been the largest regional trade deal in history at roughly 39 percent of the global GDP. Former President Barack Obama relied on Republican support when trying to implement the deal, with many on the left opposing it.

Trump was able to unilaterally withdraw from the deal because it never received a final congressional vote. Congress had delayed holding a final vote on the trade deal prompting some to believe it was already dead. It had drawn fierce criticism and became a main talking point during the campaign.

Follow Connor on Twitter

Subscribe for the Latest From InsideSources Every Morning

Business Groups Applaud Trump’s Labor Board Pick

President Donald Trump’s pick Monday to fill a vacant labor board seat is being praised by business groups that hope he will bring balance to the agency.

President Donald Trump has made workforce issues a critical component of his agenda. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) could play an important role since it oversees union and labor dispute cases. Trump announced his intent to nominate Marvin Kaplan to fill one of two remaining empty seats.

The NLRB is supposed to act as an independent judicial body for labor dispute cases. Critics contest the board is politically driven, with the issue becoming radically more pronounced during the last administration. They have argued the board overstepped its authority by unilaterally changing labor law through case precedent.

“We’ve worked with Marvin over the years and he will be a great addition to the NLRB,” Randy Johnson, senior vice president of labor and immigration at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, told InsideSources. “He is balanced and thoughtful.”

Former President Barack Obama oversaw major changes to workplace regulations during his time in office. The NLRB became a critical player in implementing some of the changes. The business community has expressed particular concern over changes made to contracting, union elections, and micro-unions.

Kaplan is currently the chief counsel of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission. He previously served as counsel for the U.S. House Oversight and Government Reform Committee and then to the U.S. House Education and Workforce Committee.

“The National Restaurant Association is very pleased with President Trump’s selection of Marvin Kaplan as a nominee to the National Labor Relations Board,” Cicely Simpson, executive vice president of the National Restaurant Association, told InsideSources. “The NLRB will be deciding a number of important issues, including the joint employer standard and micro-unions, that directly impact small businesses.”

The NLRB made several changes during the last administration that the business community has fought. How union elections are held became one of the more contentious issues. Those opposed have called the change the “ambush election” rule because it shortens the amount of time union elections are held. The agency argued it was to streamline the process.

The NLRB also allowed unions to form a new type of bargaining unit known as micro-unions back in 2011. A micro-union focuses on a specialty group of employees instead of the entire workplace. Essentially, a union doesn’t need to get a majority vote to create a bargaining unit but rather win support within a subgroup of workers.

The International Franchise Association (IFA) noted particular concern over changes made to the joint-employer standard. The standard determines whether an employer is responsible for the employees and labor liabilities of a company it contracts with.

“A more sensible approach to labor policy will help make the American Dream more accessible to aspiring franchise owners,” IFA President Robert Cresanti said in a statement provided to InsideSources. “We are hopeful the Senate will swiftly confirm Kaplan and President Trump will quickly fill the remaining seat so they can restore balance and reason to a labor board that has tipped the scales against the needs of employers and employees for far too long.”

The joint-employer standard was previously determined based on whether a company had direct control over the employees of another business. That control could be over things like wages, the hiring process, or scheduling. The new standard looked at indirect control, which critics argue is too vague.

“While this appointment is an important step by the Trump Administration, only Congress can truly solve the web of confusion created by the actions of the previous Board on the joint employer issue,” Cresanti said. “We are hopeful both sides of the aisle can work together to help get our businesses back on track.”

Employers take on a lot of legal burdens and costs when they become joint-employers. The NLRB brought about the new standard by changing how it ruled on those cases. The Department of Labor (DOL), under the new administration, announced June 7 it will withdraw from the new standard.

The NLRB has argued the standard needed to be updated. The board has stated that the previous standard was outdated and was defined by conflicting case law. It notes a new standard needed to be applied that fits better in the current economic landscape.

Trump named Philip Miscimarra to serve as the chairman of the board April 24. Miscimarra was already a member and serving as the acting chairman. The Senate still needs to approve two more nominations before the administration gains majority control.

Trump has also managed to fill other appointments that are important to his economic agenda. Alexander Acosta being confirmed as labor secretary is one of the more critical appointments for businesses.

Trump also announced his intent Monday to nominate Patrick Pizzella to serve as the deputy secretary of labor.

Follow Connor on Twitter

Subscribe for the Latest From InsideSources Every Morning

Fighting the Workforce Skills Gap

skills gap

The labor skills gap has become a contentious issue with no clear solution. But better understanding what exactly is happening is critical to eventually solving it.

Economists and policymakers have been in a fierce debate over how best to address the skills gap problem. Some have even argued the problem is overblown and possibly nonexistent. While the debate continues, many employers have been expressing great concern over their ability to get workers with the skills they need.

“We have all these jobs open, and we have all these people unemployed–where’s the disconnect?” Kristen Fyfe-Mills, the associate director of communications at the Association for Talent Development, told InsideSources. “Clearly there is something that is missing from the workforce.”

The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) recently reported that job openings had increased to six million. At the same time, new hires decreased. The BLS also found in a 2015 report that the country is projected to produce one million fewer technical workers than is needed over the next decade.

“It is, in fact, a significant challenge,” Melody Barnes, who serves as chairwoman of the Forum for Community Solutions at the Aspen Institute, told InsideSources. “There a lot of different economists and people who have looked at the problem and they have spoken to different aspects of the challenge, and that’s why it may lead to some confusion over the significance of the problem.”

Economists have approached the problem in a number of ways. Some believe the skills gap is occurring because people are not being provided needed skills through school and training. Others assert the issue is the result of certain industries not paying adequate wages to attract skilled talent.

“There are those that look at issues around wages, and there are others who look at the gap in terms of experience and training to meet the available jobs,” Barnes said. “People look at the issue of mobility, and the ability of people to move to places, with the requisite skills, where job openings exist. All those issues play a role.”

Industries with the most pronounced skills gap typically are in need of workers with technical skills. Those skills encompass the knowledge needed to accomplish mathematical, engineering, scientific, or computer-related tasks. The tech-sector and manufacturing have been in increasing need of those types of workers. Some foreign countries have even attempted to take advantage of the shortfall in tech by promising companies skilled workers.

“There is a skills gap, you can call it a middle skills gap because, in a lot of cases, it is technical skills that aren’t so much four-year college skills,” Chris Tilly, a professor at the University of California, Los Angeles, told InsideSources. “They’re more hands-on skills that you might get through apprenticeships, or through community college training.”

Industry groups and employers in those industries have been warning there just aren’t enough workers with the skills they need. Many young adults go to traditional four-year colleges, but that leaves employers in desperate need of workers who have a technical skill set. The result is a mismatch between what people are learning and what employers actually need.

“We have jobs that are open for months or years, we have people who are out work,” Fyfe-Mills said. “Why is it that the people who are out of work can’t be filling these jobs. It would be largely because they don’t have the skills these people are looking for.”

The skills gap issue doesn’t seem to be an isolated occurrence either. The Manpower Group, a human resources consultancy, found in its annual talent shortage survey that 40 percent of employers worldwide reported a lack of workers with needed skills. The shortage of skilled labor has increased steadily since 2010.

“We have employers who have identified a set of jobs that they are having trouble finding workers for that have the requisite skills,” said Barnes, who served as a top aide to former President Barack Obama. “At the same time we also have a population of people who are not employed and not participating in the labor market right now, who don’t have the necessary skills for the jobs that are available.”

Tilly notes that a major part of the problem is that young adults are often pushed to get a four-year college degree.  Careers that require a four-year college degree are often viewed as having a higher status in society. The reality, however, is that careers in technical fields are often better paid and more aligned with people who are better with hands-on work.

“Right now we’re sending off millions of young people to two and four-year schools who don’t finish anything,” Georgetown University Prof. Harry Holzer told InsideSources. “They mostly don’t get much value out of what they’ve finished, or, like I said, some people finish the wrong thing.”

Holzer says people seeking to get into the middle class will need a post-secondary credential that the labor market values. He adds policymakers could help by making it easier to get retrained so that workers can gain needed skills in the event what they have studied is not needed or is starting to phase out.

“One of the biggest challenges that we have, and this is something we certainly worked on when I was in the administration, is identifying the best way to try to help more people get better training and the right type of training for the jobs that aren’t just available today, but the jobs that will be available tomorrow,” Barnes said.

Barnes adds that examining available data can help give a better picture of what skills will be needed in the future. Experts and policymakers can use the data to track trends in the labor market.

Fyfe-Mills argues employers can also use these trends to better prepare for their future needs.

“Training is certainly part of the solution, but its not a one and done thing,” Fyfe-Mills said. “It’s really about organizations being able to look at what they have and what they need, paying attention to what the trends are in their own industries, and their own fields, and making sure they have the people in place who will help them get to that future state.”

Fyfe-Mills says that it would also help for employers to form more partnerships with colleges and other job training programs. Those programs could then more accurately provide the skills employers need or are going to need. The skills gap would, presumably, start to close as the mismatch between needed skills and education is addressed.

“There’s several different ways to look at that,” Fyfe-Mills said. “Creating an environment where businesses and education, are not necessarily singing out of the same songbook, but collaborating to work in the local community and region to create good jobs with rightly skilled people for those opportunities.”

President Donald Trump has looked towards apprenticeships as a potential solution. He signed an executive order last week aimed at increasing the number of apprenticeship programs. The executive order rolls back regulations so that companies, unions, and industry groups alike can more easily create their own apprenticeship programs.

Trump has also received criticism for supposedly undercutting job training elsewhere. His proposed budget May 23 would cut some established federal job training programs significantly. CNN and a number of other news outlets highlighted the apparent inconsistency.

“What we’re seeing right now is a reticence to put necessary resources, or even to maintain resources, in government job training programs to help meet some of the needs that are there,” Barnes said. “So there’s a lot of concern about cuts that have been proposed to the Department of Labor and job training programs.”

Trump is not the first president to look towards apprenticeship and job training programs as a way to close the skills gap. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) found in a 2011 report that the federal government spends about $18 billion annually on these programs. Former President Barack Obama, for instance, invested $90 million into a federal program focused exclusively on apprenticeships.

“This is a conversation that has been going on since at least the late 80s and early 90s,” Tilly, who has written extensively on the skills gap issue, said. “There have been attempts to develop apprenticeship programs. There was actually a push under the Clinton presidency, the Bush presidency tried some of it, the Obama administration did some more of it.”

Some economists believe the skills gap issue arises from wages not being high enough to attract skilled workers. Those workers with desirable skills may look to industries with fewer opportunities, or even dropout of the labor market, if they feel the wages being offered in technical fields are not worth their time.

“I think skill gaps show up less in unemployment, but more in terms of low-wages that people are dropping out of the labor force, sometimes because of those low-wages,” Holzer said. “So, if you frame it that way, then I think the skills gap is real.”

University of Michigan-Flint Prof. Thomas Hemphill points to manufacturing as an example of where the problem has been occurring. Manufacturing has become more technically advanced over the years which has changed its labor needs. The industry requires fewer workers but has also gained a greater need for workers with more advanced technical skills like engineering.

“Today in manufacturing people have to be better skilled than in any other point in our history,” Hemphill, who has addressed the issue in a number of reports, told InsideSources. “There is a dilemma that they want people who are skilled, yet they’re not willing to pay the wages.”

Hemphill adds its difficult for employers to raise wages in industries that compete in the global market. Technology has made the world more interconnected which has yielded some very positive results like better access to international trade.

A more interconnected world has a downside, as well. Domestic industries now have increased competition from foreign countries that have cheaper labor. But even if domestic industries find a way to adequately raise wages, it’s still not a guarantee they will be able to attract workers with the skills they need.

“Just jacking up wages doesn’t necessarily solve the problem if there are other problems, like in the education and training pipeline,” Holzer said.

The labor skills gap might also be the result of inadequate information. People may seek out training and college courses without fully understanding what skills are needed. They might also not be aware of what opportunities are available to them.

“I think there are definitely skills gaps,” said Joshua Wright of Economic Modeling Specialists. “Some of those gaps could be more so information gaps. Job seekers don’t know what they should be studying and trained for and what opportunities are out there. There could be wage gaps where employers aren’t paying enough.”

The skills gap issue can also be better understood when looked at from the local level. The overall economy shows a much different picture than the needs and concerns of local economies. Those concerns may include skills gaps related to the local industries.

“It really depends on where you are at and what the local economy specializes in, the key industries in a specific metro area or a group of counties,” Wright said. “That drives the workforce needs and any gaps, if there are any there.”

Wright adds that it is worthwhile to look at the issue in the context of the overall economy, but he emphasizes the need to look at local data in order to better understand what is happening. The defining characteristics of a local economy are often different than in other places.

The skills gap debate has also raised doubts about the problem itself. Some economists have expressed skepticism over how big the problem is. Some others have even argued that the problem doesn’t actually exist. They note wages should be increasing more than they are if employers were truly trying to attract more skilled workers.

“There’s a lot of controversy over whether there’s such a thing as a skills gap,” Kaiden, manager for career development at the Association for Talent Development, told InsideSources. “Some people will say absolutely, we must fill the gap.”

University of Pennsylvania Prof. Peter Cappelli noted in a 2014 report that the source of the complaint is dubious. The report detailed how the claim primarily comes from employer surveys and reports produced by business associations, rather than market indicators like wage increases.

“They say you can’t have a skills shortage unless wages are rising,” Holzer said. “A lot of people used that during the Great Recession to argue there is no skills shortage, or there is no skills gap because it was hard to find wages rising anywhere. I think that was false because there was so much slack in the labor market that it was covering areas that have tightened around some skills.”

The Economic Policy Institute (EPI) found in a 2014 report that the main problem might actually be demand. Businesses have not seen demand for their goods increase in a way that would require more robust employment gains.

“People are saying that salaries aren’t rising the way that they should, if its really a tight market, and there really is such a thing as a skills gap, we should see salaries going up more,” Kaiden said. “So you’ll hear this argument that there is no skills gap. But from what I hear talking to employers they’re having trouble finding the right people to fill the positions. I think it’s this mismatch of the right people in the right location.”

The skills gap issue is complicated and therefore there is no clear solution. More so, the problem likely will require multiple solutions to address its many components. Something that works for one industry might not for others. Where the problem is occurring locally is also another factor.

“I don’t think there is a one size fits all solution,” Kaiden said. “I think it really depends on the industry, location, employer, and skill set they’re missing. But I think building partnerships with local organizations is a very good solution, but then again, it doesn’t work for everything.”

The skills gap issue doesn’t account for everyone who is not working. The economy faces a number of problems that have caused the labor force participation rate to fall. The rate in which people have been dropping out of the workforce accelerated following the 2007 financial crisis. It leveled out over the past year, but has failed to regain those losses.

“So there are a bunch of these jobs–machinists, technicians of various kinds–where they can’t find enough people with the right skills, and that is a problem,” Tilly said. “On the other hand, that’s not the main source of unemployment. The main source of unemployment is still that the economy is not functioning at full capacity.”

The labor force participation rate does account for retirees, student adults, and others who have a good reason not to be in the labor market. The concern is that many working-age adults without a disability have also dropped out. Nevertheless, the large number of retirees are potentially a problem, as well.

“I think as the overall labor market tightens, which it has, and as baby boomers keep retiring, which they’re doing, you will see skill gaps in more occupations and industries,” Holzer said. “I think in those cases you will see some wage pressure, you will see employers undertaking more training programs, you will see them working more with community colleges, or other service providers to get more of those skills going.”

The Wagner-Peyser Act established the first nationwide employment service. The act helped coordinate local public employment offices which had been helping displaced and struggling workers. The Workforce Investment Act later consolidated most federal job training programs when it was enacted in 1998.

Follow Connor on Twitter

Subscribe for the Latest From InsideSources Every Morning

CEOs Pledge to Expand Apprenticeship Programs After Trump Speech

President Donald Trump’s push to expand apprenticeship opportunities is being met with support from business leaders who are now pledging to take part.

Trump has put working class issues at the forefront of his agenda. He signed an executive order Thursday aimed at increasing the number apprenticeship programs. The president hopes to address the skills gap by ensuring people are being trained for jobs that exist.

While there are plenty of jobs available, the challenge has been a significant divide between the skills companies need and the training and experience workers have. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported last week that the country has six million job openings.

The Business Roundtable (BRT), a coalition of business leaders, released a list of business presidents who support the initiative. The almost two hundred names listed have promised to expand their own apprenticeship programs.

“Business Roundtable members take our responsibly as CEOs seriously to help ensure American workers can succeed in the jobs of today and tomorrow,” BRT noted in a release. “We applaud the President’s commitment to industry-driven apprenticeships as a powerful tool to build the skilled workforce prepared for the jobs of the 21st century.”

General Electric CEO Jeff Immelt, Nasdaq CEO Adena Friedman, Lockheed Martin CEO Marillyn Hewson, and many other top business presidents pledged their support. The list included 180 business presidents total. Verizon, Oracle Corporation, General Motors, and Accenture were also listed.

Industry groups have also come out in support of the push to expand apprenticeship opportunities. The National Restaurant Association noted more apprenticeship programs will help workers get useful skills. The International Franchise Association also applauded the move.

Trump signed the executive order after hosting a private roundtable discussion with a group of governors. The meeting reportedly focused on the need for better job training and more apprenticeship programs. The executive order is designed to increase the number of apprenticeship opportunities by rolling back restrictions.

The labor skills gap has been getting increasingly more attention. Nevertheless, how to address the skills gap, and whether it’s even a real problem, have been points of debate. Joshua Wright of Economic Modeling Specialists says the concern is real, but there are nuances to consider.

“I don’t think that’s necessarily a misconception,” Wright tells InsideSources. “It really depends on where you’re at, what the local economy specializes in, and the key industries in a specific metro area, or group of counties. That drives the workforce needs and what type of gaps, if there are any there.”

The Department of Labor is now responsible for drafting rules so the executive order can be initiated. The rulemaking process involves several steps that can become lengthy at times. The proposed rules should allow companies, unions, and industry groups alike to more easily create their own apprenticeship programs.

Trump has received criticism for supposedly undercutting job training and the workforce elsewhere. His proposed budget May 23 would cut some established federal job training programs significantly. CNN and a number of other news outlets highlighted the apparent inconsistency.

Labor unions have been particularly critical of the president. Unions have condemned him for undermining worker rights and protections while rolling back regulations in an attempt to spur economic growth. Unions generally support efforts to improve job training but have not said much on what the president is planning.

Follow Connor on Twitter

Subscribe for the Latest From InsideSources Every Morning

Trump Moves to Bolster Apprenticeships With Executive Order

President Donald Trump signed an executive order to increase the number apprenticeship programs Thursday while meeting with several governors at the White House.

Trump has focused his presidency on helping workers struggling in a lackluster economy. The widening labor skills gap is one issue the administration is now looking to address. Apprenticeship and job training programs have been viewed by some as a potential way to address the problem.

Trump has spoken about bolstering apprenticeships several times in his young presidency. He held a roundtable discussion with governors and Cabinet members in a closed meeting Thursday. The president followed the meeting by signing an executive order designed to increase the number of apprenticeship programs.

“We’re here today to celebrate the dignity of work,” Trump said before signing the order. “In just a few minutes I’ll sign an executive order to expand apprenticeship and vocational training, to help all Americans find a rewarding career, earn a great living, support themselves and their families, and love going to work in the morning.”

Trumps says the goal is to rollback federal restrictions that have prevented some industries from creating apprenticeship programs. The executive order directs the labor department to draft rules which will allow companies, unions, and industry groups to create their own programs.

“So we’re empowering these companies, unions, industry groups, and federal agencies to go out and create new apprenticeships for millions of our citizens,” Trump said. “Apprenticeships place students into great jobs, without the crippling debt of traditional four-year college degrees.”

Trump seems to be sending some mixed signals when it comes to job training. He has promised to promote job training since the campaign, but some actions seem to run counter to the message. His proposed budget May 23 would cut some established federal job training programs significantly.

Trump was joined by a number of governors and cabinet members including Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker. Both Walker and the president met earlier in the week to discuss workforce issues. Walker is a controversial figure on labor issues as a result of his efforts to limit union power in his state.

Industry leaders have offered praise for Trump’s efforts to support job training. “The restaurant industry fully supports the President’s Executive Order and thanks the President and Secretary Acosta for their continued focus on apprenticeships – a proven recognized path to full and rewarding careers.” National Restaurant Association President Dawn Sweeney said in a statement provided to InsideSources.

Trump was originally expected to unveil his new initiative after a meeting at the Labor Department Wednesday. The meeting, however, was canceled due to Republican lawmakers being shot at during a congressional baseball game practice. The president took a moment to reflect on the incident and wish Rep. Steve Scalise a quick recovery from his gunshot wound.

President Trump also thanked his daughter and assistant Ivanka Trump for spearheading the initiative. Ivanka Trump has been an adamant proponent for workforce issues like paid family leave.

Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta was among those who joined the signing. His department is now tasked with drafting the new rules. The Labor Department will also be responsible for approving the apprenticeship programs once they start getting proposed.

Follow Connor on Twitter

Subscribe for the Latest From InsideSources Every Morning